What about them? They both fucked off.
What I mean is that because I was owner on those two, i would not be happy with them being out there and me not being owner.
Does that make sense? I feel like I can't words right now.
You definitely cannot: it doesn't.
Ok well.
It'd be like if Rusty fell and I went "I'm gonna revive it"
So I revived it, gave it the same name, and then you weren't owner. It'd feel weird right?
What I'm saying is if you brought back DG or BOG it would be this weird uncomfortable thing because I wouldn't be owner.
It wouldn't feel weird. It'd make me angry tbh.
And it's not the same thing because owned, founded and funded them both. All the rest of the staff have changed around. To me that is like saying you were admin on bog so you should be admin on trc or it'd feel weird.
^^^ I second this. Purely because he is the founder and funder of all. If I were Owner and then it shut down and re-opened I wouldn't expect to be part owner again unless asked. People come and go as staff on servers all the time. It's not unheard of a co-owner to leave and then rejoin the server as a player. It's confusing to explain xD but I know where WILL is coming from and I agree
I understand where you are coming from, but it's just like, being a part of those particular server names in particular, you may not realise how much those servers have helped me get through high school.
To suddenly not be part of that would be upsetting.